How Superduper Does a Physicalist Supervenience Need to Be?
نویسنده
چکیده
It has recently been made clear that the standard formulations of the supervenience relation – weak, global and strong, among others – are too programmatic to be the full answer to a physicalist’s prayers. All the standard formulations present the supervenience of one set of properties on another in terms of property correlations, without placing any constraints on the dependency relation eVecting these correlations. It turns out that such abstract characterizations do not ensure that properties supervening upon (what are assumed to be) physicalistically acceptable base properties are themselves physicalistically acceptable. Most disastrously, the standard formulations of supervenience turn out one and all to permit supervenient properties to be emergent in a way at odds with materialism. What physicalism needs to support a materialist metaphysics is ‘superdupervenience’ – supervenience that guarantees that supervenient properties are ‘nothing over and above’ their physicalistically acceptable base properties. Terence Horgan (p. 563) has suggested that the following constraint will do the job:
منابع مشابه
Varieties of Supervenience
Supervenience is a concept borrowed from moral philosophy by philosophy of mind to solve the mind-body problem. The mind-body problem is actually a set of problems, among which the major ones are the Consciousness problem (Illustrative instance: how can physical states have felt qualities?) and the Intentionality Problem (Illustrative instance: How can physical states be about something, or be ...
متن کاملSubstance Dualism or Eliminativism
Physicalism (P) entails minimal physicalism (MP), MP entails minimal supervenience (MS), and MS is the thesis that there is covariance between the supervenient and the subvenient stuff. Therefore, if the (alleged) supervenient and subvenient stuff do not covary, then MS is false, and if MS is false then MP is false, and if MP is false then P is false. Put differently: if MS is false then P is f...
متن کاملSupervenience-based Formulations of Physicalism*
Filling in the schema requires specifying what it is for an entity to be physical, and what it is for an entity to be ‘‘nothing over and above’’ some other entities. Some have worried that no account of the physical is adequate for physicalist purposes; and I’ll soon say a bit about how physicalists have responded (in my view, successfully) to this worry. But my main focus here is on nothing ov...
متن کاملHow to Keep the ' Physical ' in Physi ( : Alism
THEJOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY HOW TO KEEP THE 'PHYSICAL' IN PHYSI(:ALISM* Physicalism is roughly the thesis (1) that every entity is either itself a physical entity or is exhaustively composed, ultimately, of physical entities, and (2) that every property is either itself a physical property or is realized, ultimately, by physical properties.l Never mind whether exhaustive composition and realizatio...
متن کاملDefining Global Supervenience
What does it mean that certain properties globally supervene on others? The paper criticises the now standard way of spelling out the notion in terms of 1-1 correlations between world-domains and proposes a modification that escapes the difficulties. The new definition can secure the additional benefit of resisting an argument to the effect that global supervenience is theoretically dispensable...
متن کامل